Thinking out loud... (conspiracy theory time...)

There's a possibility that the documents that indicate that president Bush may not have adequately completed his service were not real. I'm just thinking out loud (or as the Party in charge might say: committing thoughtcrime) but, is it possible that the documents were intentionally created as forgeries and leaked to the media so that it may cast doubt as to who would create such documents and to the authenticity of other documents that can be proven authentic? Obviously, blame would be placed directly at the opponent of the president, in this case John Kerry, as the attacker who would have reason to use forgery to put a chink in the Bush armor. This is a logical conclusion to dismiss the information as biased and not authentic, taking Kerry down a notch. An investigation is conducted, an innocent party confesses to guilt in conspiracy and steps down and is summarily indicted, arrested, convicted and lives in shame. Kerry loses ground in the public poles - biased though they may be - and Bush gets added points for sympathy vote.

But, isn't there a member of Bush's brain trust who has a history of doing shady things to discredit opponents in political races? Didn't Karl Rove once bug his own office so that his opponent would be convicted in the press (a press that frequently convicts innocent people by over-reporting, rarely lets facts get in the way of a good story, and never ever apologizes when they get it wrong) so that the candidate he worked for would win in a landslide?

Just asking.